Re: inclusion of r8098 into 1.0

On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 12:48:09AM -0500, Greg Hudson wrote:
> But Apache modules aren't installed for normal linking purposes like
> Subversion RA libraries are. So if we want to adopt the Apache scheme,
> we'll have to create a directory for RA libraries and install symlinks
> to the actual libraries, or copies of them, or something. (I'm not
> actually sure whether libtool would help us do the symlink thing
> portably.)

Actually I would much prefer this. Treating the RA libraries as regular
libraries was rather confusing to me at first. But then that would be
possibly problematic as you don't always use DSO.

> I'd say we should just ditch run-time repository loading, but Ben uses
> it in the Red Hat RPMs, and it means that the installed binary set can
> be chopped up more finely than it could otherwise.

Mandrake. But yeah it does make the packages not suck in dependencies
that a user wouldn't need otherwise.

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org