[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r8181 - branches/1.0-stabilization

From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: 2004-01-08 08:20:35 CET

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:23:23PM -0600, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> That's what I originally thought too, but it turns out that's not what
> "concept" +1's mean. Rather, they mean you basically approve of this
> specific patch, but have one or two concerns you want to discuss
> before giving full approval. (See the STATUS file about this.)
> I don't know what the concept +1 meant for this change, but since it
> already had three +1's, and one of 'em was mine, I'm not gonna worry
> about it too much :-)

Somehow I get the general feeling that gstein is voting under and
entirely different system then everyone else. That's why I asked.

Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 8 08:21:19 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.