[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r8169 - branches/1.0-stabilization

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_lyra.org>
Date: 2004-01-07 13:56:54 CET

On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:56:47PM -0500, Greg Hudson wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 13:25, kfogel@tigris.org wrote:
> > * Issue #1652
> > Error messages cf most important conventions [patch in issue].
> > - -0: gstein (we seem to be doing fine with our current msgs so far)
> > + -0: gstein, kfogel (seem to be doing fine with our current msgs so far)
> How can anyone feel this way?
> equal-rites% svn log -r1 http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/1.0-stabilization
> svn: REPORT request failed on '/repos/svn/!svn/bc/1/branches/1.0-stabilization'
> svn: '/repos/svn/!svn/bc/1/branches/1.0-stabilization' path not found
> Granted, #1652 doesn't fix the really egregious problems like this. But
> our error messages are not "fine"; they are really bad. Given that 1652

I believe we're "doing fine", not that the messages are fine. Could they
be improved? Most definitely. There is a lot of polish that can be applied
for a 1.1 release, but which I'm not interested in seeing for 1.0.

All IMO, of course, but that is exactly what the votes in STATUS are all


Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jan 7 14:02:07 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.