[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r8155 - branches/1.0-stabilization

From: John Peacock <jpeacock_at_rowman.com>
Date: 2004-01-05 21:23:55 CET

kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> (Note that all of this is independent of the version numbering thread,
> which is something we *do* need to have resolved around the time 1.0
> is released. We know that 1.0 will be 'subversion-1.0.tar.gz', but
> we'll want to be prepared to make new releases immediately after that,
> without debate about what to call them!)

Shouldn't that be 'subversion-1.0.0.tar.gz' instead? No matter if we do
even/odd or whatever, the version model we are adopting:


mandates that versions are denoted as triplets of integers. It would be best
(IMHO) to have the filename completely encapsulate the internal version


John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD  20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 5 21:24:17 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.