Re: svn commit: r8155 - branches/1.0-stabilization

kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> (Note that all of this is independent of the version numbering thread,
> which is something we *do* need to have resolved around the time 1.0
> is released. We know that 1.0 will be 'subversion-1.0.tar.gz', but
> we'll want to be prepared to make new releases immediately after that,
> without debate about what to call them!)

Shouldn't that be 'subversion-1.0.0.tar.gz' instead? No matter if we do
even/odd or whatever, the version model we are adopting:

        http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html

mandates that versions are denoted as triplets of integers. It would be best
(IMHO) to have the filename completely encapsulate the internal version
representation.

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD  20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org