Re: svn commit: r8155 - branches/1.0-stabilization

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> This is Not Okay in my book. A developer who only seems to have the
> time for our mailing list once every few weeks comes in, shows no
> evidence of having read the relevant mail threads, and just throws down
> a veto with no substantial justification. No mail thread, no adherence
> to the STATUS file's instructions about vetos, nothing.

The sentiments above could have been expressed a little more gently
with the point still getting across, but no big deal.

Gstein mostly lurks these days, but he actually keeps up on threads
amazingly well (I've learned in private conversation that he's usually
following everything at at least a summary level, and technical
threads at at least one level deeper than that). I recommend against
speculating about how much of a mail thread he has or hasn't read :-).

But yes -- a justification needs to be provided for the veto, and I'm
sure he'll do that now.

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 5 17:57:51 2004