mark benedetto king <mbk@lowlatency.com> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:24:27PM -0600, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> > mbk@tigris.org writes:
> > > Add #408, and vote for it.
> >
> > I'm assuming that votes for a patch are always applicable to the
> > latest incarnation of the patch, on the theory that the author
> > wouldn't have made any controversial changes this late in the game?
> >
> > That's fine w/ me if fine with you...
>
> Well, this is a little slippery, because it means that after you
> vote for a patch you had better pay attention as it evolves, to make
> sure that it doesn't have any retrograde motion.
I prefer that too, now that I think about it some more.
So we just need to be careful with this issue (#408) that the votes
stay in sync with the patch, since you're planning to update it. The
current +1's will be invalidated when you attach a new edition to the
issue.
-K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 30 23:17:01 2003