Re: Casting 1.0 votes

--On Saturday, December 27, 2003 1:54 AM -0800 Ben Reser <ben@reser.org> wrote:

> He didn't. He said votes needed to be cast by the 8th. He asked
> everyone to wait until all the issues were determined before voting
> however.

My take is that we're unlikely to say, "Oh, *now* here's all of the candidates
for 1.0." It'll never happen because someone will always add things they want
until the deadline. And, I think if they get the 3 +1s before our deadline,
then more power to them - it should go in.

After reviewing what's been proposed in STATUS so far, my take is that they
either fall into the 'obvious' correctness fix (which we'd want anyway in our
next public release), or they are specifically geared to expanding our API in
a model that we'd want to support once we 'hit' 1.0 and beyond.

So, I think for the most part, people have the right scope in the issues
listed in STATUS. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Dec 27 11:31:55 2003