[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Expected post-1.0 release cycle?

From: Jack Repenning <jrepenning_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-12-24 04:58:50 CET

On Dec 23, 2003, at 5:56 PM, Greg Hudson wrote:

> We do need to (eventually) think about how someone will upgrade from
> svn
> 1.x to svn 2.x in an environment that can't do flag days. Jack's
> protocol discipline allows us to say "upgrade the server first, and
> then
> the clients, and all will be well."

Yes, that's the idea.

> Jack's API discipline may be less important, if we're careful to make
> it
> possible to have both the svn 1.x and svn 2.x libraries installed on a
> machine.

I buy that, as long as the 1.x libraries continue to *work* (e.g.,
keeping a 1.x database access library isn't much help if the schema

Jack Repenning
CollabNet, Inc.
8000 Marina Boulevard, Suite 600
Brisbane, California 94005
o: 650.228.2562
c: 408.835.8090

  • application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Wed Dec 24 04:59:23 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.