Re: RFC: date parser rewrite

On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 03:55:04PM -0600, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> mark benedetto king <mbk@lowlatency.com> writes:
> > I expect my implementation to be less than 100 lines of code. I think
> > Greg Hudson would be willing to review it thoroughly, and probably
> > Brane would too. Yes, they could be fixing other bugs or reviewing
> > other changes, instead...
>
> Would you be reluctant to put in the effort until you knew it was "in
> principle" approved for 1.0? It would be so nice to actually have the
> patch before going farther... But I understand your time is limited.

Sure. If things are as simple as I claim, your concerns will probably be
allayed. If not, we'll have real code to point at and make harder
decisions about.

--ben

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 19 23:54:36 2003