[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: what voting means, what voting doesn't mean

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-12-19 19:51:33 CET

mark benedetto king <mbk@lowlatency.com> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:58:51AM -0600, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> > Today we begin deciding which fixes go into 1.0 and which don't (let's
> > wait until the 1.0-stabilization branch is created, though).
> What should be considered a "drop-dead" date for new commits to be
> considered for 1.0? I have two planned for this weekend.

Good question, yeah.

Let's say this Monday, Dec 22, is preferred, with Jan. 1 at the
outside. Does that sound okay?

Of course, a serious bug can be discovered at any point, so it isn't a
hard-and-fast deadline. However, after the voting is done and we see
roughly how much flux is anticipated in the 1.0-stabilization line,
I'll propose an actual 1.0 release date, roughly 4-6 weeks away.

Comments welcome, as always,

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 19 20:42:39 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.