[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Merge policies regarding bindings

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-12-17 16:02:31 CET

Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:

> Chia-Liang Kao wrote:
> > I was thinking about proposing that bindings changes are allowed
> > to be merged for 1.0. Since that all the bindings are not as
> > complete as it should be under the '1.0' brand, nor does the
> > stablization issues that people concern most seem to cover the
> > bindings. In the case i think we should probably let the
> > maintainer of the bindings to decide what is to be merged since
> > they carry the responsiblity to support them after the release.
> That makes perfect sense to me.

And to me.

> We should probably also document somewhere that the language bindings
> are not holding themselves to the same backwards compatability
> constraints that the core Subversion libraries are, just so nobody gets
> the wrong idea about how stable they are.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Dec 17 16:04:39 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.