Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> Chia-Liang Kao wrote:
> > I was thinking about proposing that bindings changes are allowed
> > to be merged for 1.0. Since that all the bindings are not as
> > complete as it should be under the '1.0' brand, nor does the
> > stablization issues that people concern most seem to cover the
> > bindings. In the case i think we should probably let the
> > maintainer of the bindings to decide what is to be merged since
> > they carry the responsiblity to support them after the release.
>
> That makes perfect sense to me.
And to me.
> We should probably also document somewhere that the language bindings
> are not holding themselves to the same backwards compatability
> constraints that the core Subversion libraries are, just so nobody gets
> the wrong idea about how stable they are.
+1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Dec 17 16:04:39 2003