On Dec 17, 2003, at 6:22 AM, John Peacock wrote:
> Ben Reser wrote:
>> I've already got some of this done. I just haven't submitted the
>> patch
>> yet. It's necessary for the prompt support reworking that I've been
>> doing. clkao found that the cv trick I used fails for closures. So
>> we're having to use a different technique that requires a more OO
>> interface to SVN::Client (SVN::Ra the other place effected already has
>> this).
>
> I'm very eager that the Perl interface changes be completed in time
> for 1.0; sounds like you are going to miss 0.35.0 by a little, so it
> is going to be harder to get +3 to apply to 1.0...
I suspect that the various language bindings are likely to see
substantial changes post 1.0 anyway, but yes, I agree that if possible
we should get as much in as we can before releasing. Assuming that
things seem functional, I wouldn't object to porting as much as
possible of the bindings subtree over to the 1.0-stabalization branch
once we get closer to release. It's not something that would horribly
destabalize things if there's a problem, and there is (obviously)
ongoing work in these areas.
>> I need to finish testing to be sure I'm not breaking something else
>> and
>> to make sure I'm really not leaking memory.
>
> If you have a way to distribute your changes (without having to burden
> the list), I will do what I can do test it. I can even host a
> semi-public repository with your changes, if that would help (i.e. you
> and clkao have write access, all others can only watch in
> horror/delight).
I don't see a problem with 'burdening the list' with these sort of
things, as I'm sure there are others like you and me who are interested
in them.
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Dec 17 14:04:42 2003