Hi Jostein,
Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>When looking at the posts on this threads, I see that this is the status
>so far about commiting the changes:
>
>r8009 +1 kfogel
> 0
> -1
>r8010 +1 dionisos kfogel bliss
> 0
> -1
>r8011 +1 dionisos kfogel bliss
> 0
> -1
>
>About r8009:
>I'm +1 on it (but that don't count as my commit access are partial). So
>If we applies the 1.0 release rules on 0.35.0 (which posting on this
>thread suggests) then r8009 will not be merged.
>One thing to notice is that all of you are talking about r8009 issues,
>but only Karl votes. May I have your votes for r8009 please? :-)
>
>
Without 8009, you can forget about javahl, because it will not compile.
>I will hold the merge for r8010 and r8011 until my evening (CET) and see
>if r8009 get some more votes or not (I have a feeling that r8009 just
>slipped away) :-)
>
>Jostein
>
>
>
Patrick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Dec 17 09:41:46 2003