Re: API issues we might want to solve for 1.0

Tobias Ringström <tobias@ringstrom.mine.nu> writes:
> And here is the patch. It looks big, but it's mostly code that's been
> moved and reindented. The patch does not touch code outside the SSL
> client certificate functionality, so I think it's quite safe.
>
> Is this code desirable/acceptable for 1.0?

We can decide that separately -- certainly it's desirable for trunk (I
haven't reviewed the patch itself, I just mean "in principle" :-) ).

In general, we need to not confuse the question of whether a change is
good with the question of whether it goes into 1.0. By committing it
on the trunk today, you are not committing it to 1.0. We can decide
afterwards whether or not to merge it.

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Dec 15 21:31:07 2003