[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: stabilize means STABILIZE (was: svn commit: rev 7961 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc)

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2003-12-11 18:05:02 CET

--On Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:55 AM -0600 kfogel@collab.net wrote:

> as the recent wc access baton thing, or Tobias's SSL auth work, should
> only be done if they bring a large benefit, and even then need three
> +1's from full committers to go in?


I think if you get 3 full committers to explicitly agree that a commit should
go in, it should be fine and shouldn't affect stability.

This is a rather big organizational change, but one I think would go a long
way to achieving the stability goal. -- justin

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 11 18:05:52 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.