On Wednesday 10 December 2003 19:46, Greg Noel wrote:
> On Sunday, Dec 7, 2003, at 06:34 US/Pacific, Sander Roobol wrote:
> > I agree, however it's not up to me to decide that. I'm subversion's
> > patch manager, and I need to make sure no patches get forgotten. The
> > issue tracker is the easiest way to store them.
>
> My position is that this patch isn't a big enough subject for an issue.
> It's so simple that if it's going to be applied at all, it should have
> been applied quickly.
>
> In fact, I figured that it would be batched in with the first change to
> the documentation. Instead, there have been several changes to the
> documentation (some quite trivial) and yet my proposed change was not
> picked up. That says that there's so little interest in it that it
> will _never_ be picked up.
>
> It's a pity, but since that's the way it is, I'd just say to drop it.
Your patch was committed this morning in r7969. It didn't drop by the
wayside. :-)
-John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 11 02:43:36 2003