On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 12:19, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> kfogel@collab.net <kfogel@collab.net>:
> > Er, okay, but it's not pending, it's solved, as far as we're
> > concerned. The version of Subversion shipped with Red Hat 9 is so far
> > behind modern Subversion that you need space-based telescopy just to
> > see it from here... (And since Red Hat is not releasing another
> > distribution in that line anyway, I'm not sure what would ever make
> > this issue get out of the "pending" state.)
>
> When I see it in an apt-get update from the Fedora repository, basically.
> I run Fedora Core 1 with *everything* installed and do daily updates;
> my predicate for when something hits the streeet is when it shows up
> in my bitstream.
Argh. I bet Fedora is going to get a *lot* more attention now. RedHat9
ships with a Subversion that's nearly a year old. I wonder if that same
ancient package is in Fedora. I think we need a real maintainer now,
someone who can keep Fedora's Subversion rpms up-to-date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Dec 10 19:23:44 2003