Re: 0.35 => Beta => 1.0 schedule

On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 19:08, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> IMHO we are looking at weeks, not months, for this stabilization
> branch. Maybe not 2-6 weeks, but probably 4-8 weeks.

Ahh. When I read
http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2003-12/0114.shtml I misread
"Jan" as "Jun", and thought we were in for a six-month haul. I was
certainly figuring we'd branch when we were closer.

If we think we can stabilize in one to two months, then sure, make a
branch.

[Regarding Fitz's versioning proposal:]
> Would this method alleviate your concerns about having clearly
> labelled releases, Greg (Hudson)?

See my comments in response to him. I don't like it, Branko doesn't
like it, and I think it's based on a preconception I disagree with (that
we'll make releases off the trunk and not off of a stable branch).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 5 02:22:31 2003