[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 0.35 => Beta => 1.0 schedule

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-12-04 18:30:22 CET

Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> writes:
> Do issues that are not in the issue tracker count? I'm thinking of
> the inconsistent handling of property value encodings.

IMHO, anything that goes into the 1.0 line needs an issue filed. If
we don't abide by that discipline, then we'll never have a clear sense
of how much work is left at any given point.

(I personally haven't felt that the property value encoding thing
needs to be solved for 1.0, that's why I haven't been responding in
the thread nor filing an issue for it. If a lot of people feel
differently, though, then... Well, let's talk :-) ).

> As these interim releases are intended to be for important bug fixes
> only, should these not be numbered 0.35.1, 0.35.2, etc. to be
> consistent with both our current and future numbering schemes? For
> example, the 1.1 series will go 1.1.1, 1.1.2 etc. (rather than 1.2,
> 1.3, etc.) while it stabilises for a 1.2 release.

Good point, thanks! Yes, let's do it that way.

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 4 19:17:17 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.