[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Revision number madness

From: John Szakmeister <john_at_szakmeister.net>
Date: 2003-12-02 13:39:03 CET

On Tuesday 02 December 2003 07:25, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> On Monday 01 December 2003 23.06, Branko ─îibej wrote:
> > > Version 0.34.0 (released 3 December 2003, from revision r7859)
> > > http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/tags/0.34.0
> >
> > On another note, could we please call it either "r7859" or "revision
> > 7859"? Saying both "revision" and using the "r" prefix is redundant.
>
> Ok, I go for "revision".

Please don't. A change was recently made to remove 'rev' and make them 'r'
throughout many places in the book and source code. Can we just use 'r'?

-John

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 2 13:35:04 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.