[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Revision number madness

From: solo turn <soloturn99_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 2003-12-01 20:48:09 CET

--- Tobias_Ringstr�m <tobias@ringstrom.mine.nu> wrote:
> Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> > Version 0.34.0 (released 3 December 2003, from revision r7859)
> I don't like this. Something is wrong if you have to guess the revision
> number for the next commit (or require everyone else to hold off their
> commits which just as bad). The whole point of using a tag is to
> identify the release. The revision number of the tag is 100% useless
> redundancy that can only confuse the users.
+1
i liked the revision number for easier finding and describing errors in
trunk, where svn --version gives the base version + revision number. i would
appreciate if the behaviour could stay as it is.

-s.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Dec 1 20:48:57 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.