[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Patch needed for javahl in release 0.34

From: Erik Huelsmann <e.huelsmann_at_gmx.net>
Date: 2003-11-29 12:06:44 CET

Patrick, Jostein,

I must say I have to agree with Ben Reeser. We probably do want to
distribute code which compiles. Adding new fixes and doing major feature overhauls is
a problem. I concur with his reasoning that the branch-lives-for-a-week
strategy is probably to fix problems like the java patch. Not the Perl stuff
(although I too would like to have it available.)


+1 on java patch
-1 on Perl patch

You will have to wait for more votes to come in though.



 Hi Jostein,
> Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> >Hi Patrick,
> >
> >On Saturday 29 November 2003 09.18, Patrick Mayweg wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi Jostein,
> >>could you add the revision 7868 for javahl to the 0.34 branch,so that
> >>the javahl binding will be compilable in the release ?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >-1
> >
> >I'm really sorry: -No! I (and I sure hope others) consider that
> >"/tags/0.34.0/" have a codefreeze (it's done a week before release for a
> >very good reason).
> >
> I do not see a /tags/0.34.0, only /branches/0.34.0. So I thought the
> codefreeze was not already active.
> >I have no problem at all to understand that it's very easy to be tempted
> >to merge stuff into the release branch, the branch just are there, ready
> >to be improved. But I say no, improvements are for upcoming versions.
> >
> >Only changes related to the new version as CHANGES, svn_version.h and
> >other stuff that's related for making a good subversion-X.YY.Z release
> >out of a given revision should be done.
> >
> >An exception from this rule is strongly needed fixes, such as: -The
> >repository will be destroyed and the cat will be put on fire if we don't
> >merge that change.
> >So, sometimes, merging from a revision have to be done in order to make
> >the release run at all.
> >
> >I know that Chia-liang is eager to have r7861 merged into the release
> >branch to (and I'm a Perl fanatic and would love to have it on 0.34.0),
> >but won't do that either without approvement from Subversion's
> >"masters".
> >
> >So my policy about this is that even changes that probably don't affect
> >stability at all won't make it before next release.
> >
> >Of course, this might be discussed and I can change my mind - in fact, I
> >have to if "everyone" says I should or else..
> >
> >Jostein
> >
> >
> Patrick
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Neu bei GMX: Preissenkung für MMS-Versand und FreeMMS!
Ideal für alle, die gerne MMS verschicken:
25 FreeMMS/Monat mit GMX TopMail.
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More! +++
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Nov 29 12:07:20 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.