On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 03:19, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> I mean,
> is there ever a time for any update-ish operation (update, switch,
> diff, merge, status -u) where it's important to know the difference
> between "this thing's contents have changed, but the result is a
> no-op" and "this things contents have no changed" ?
I don't think so. It should be fine to always say the latter.
>From another message:
> I still have some remaining doubt and confusion about textdeltas. My
> assumption here is that the goal of a textdelta (in the general case)
> is to inform you about how to construct some fulltext given some other
> fulltext. What is the expected outcome from a no-op textdelta then (a
> single, NULL window)? Does that mean, "You're final outcome should be
> the empty file", or "You're final outcome is exactly the same as your
> source file"?
I think you got here on your own, but it means: "your final outcome
should be the empty file." (It also means: whenever you use an
apostrophe with a pronoun, you're using a contraction, not a possessive.
:) )
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 26 17:23:33 2003