[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] svn_fs_text_changed

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2003-11-26 02:26:26 CET

"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato@collab.net> writes:

> Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
>> You didn't make a branch, so there's no history relating dir1 to dir2,
>> without history we always send delete plus add.
> Diff and merge pass the ignore_ancestry flag to dir-delta, which tells
> that sucker to not pay attention to relatedness,

I'd forgotten about that change.

> It's not the output that I'm concerned with. It's the extra work
> happening under the hood. If you still have your test scenario above,
> set a breakpoint on repos_diff.c:window_handler. If you even once see
> a non-NULL window, Subversion is being inefficient. And that's what I
> was seeing.

Using HEAD, one window_handler() call per file has a non-NULL
window. Adding/removing --notice-ancestry makes no difference.

Philip Martin
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 26 02:28:43 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.