[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion on various Linux file systems performance test

From: Marc Haisenko <haisenko_at_webport.de>
Date: 2003-11-21 15:35:06 CET

On Friday 21 November 2003 15:38, Brian Denny wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:36:50PM -0800, Brandon Ehle wrote:
> > There are lots of filesystems, I just tried to include the default ones.
> > I just didn't know that any distros had ReiserFS in the default kernel.
> I am pretty sure that the last time I installed SuSE, it not only
> included ReiserFS, but gave the impression (in the installer) that
> it was a good choice for most partitions (possibly even was a default).
> -brian

Yes, that's because SuSE houses some key developers of ReiserFS and thus can
support ReiserFS better than other FS's (I guess). And it is a quite stable
and good FS, IMHO (although I prefer ext3).

Marc Haisenko
Webport IT-Services GmbH
mailto: haisenko@webport.de
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 21 15:35:55 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.