--- Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> wrote:
> Brandon Ehle wrote:
> > Julian Foad wrote:
> >
> >> Brandon Ehle wrote:
> >>
> >>> Here is the results of my Subversion benchmark running checkout with
> >>> the working copy and repository located on various file systems.
> [...]
> >>> http://subversion.kicks-ass.org/svn-fs-bench/
> >>
> >> Interesting. I'm using ReiserFS 3.6.9 on kernel 2.4.21 (SuSE 9); it's
> >> a shame you don't have that combination. I am surprised to see
> [...]
> >
> > If you have a link to the kernel source that you use (hopefully not 400
> > hundreds patchs that I'll manually have to apply because I'm not running
> > Suse), I'll give it a whirl and see how the 2.4 ReiserFS performance
> > stacks up.
>
> I don't care about any difference between the exact versions of our 2.4 kernels (2.4.21 + SuSE
> patches, and 2.4.22). What I meant was that your page doesn't include results for ReiserFS on
> kernel 2.4.X. If you are building from source then presumably you have the source for both
> ReiserFS 3.X and kernel 2.4.X, or if not you probably know better than I do where to find them.
>
> Thanks for the offer, but there's no need to go to extra trouble on my account. I imagine you
> would already have measured Reiser and/or XFS on 2.4 if it was easy to do so.
>
There are lots of filesystems, I just tried to include the default ones. I just didn't know that
any distros had ReiserFS in the default kernel.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 20 23:37:38 2003