On Tuesday 18 November 2003 16:19, Branko Čibej wrote:
> kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> >Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> >>>The system
> >>>username might be totally unrelated to the usernames used by the
> >>>repository. So $LastChangedBy$ should be unaffected, IMHO.
> >>
> >>I disagree. If export can't figure out who made the local changes, it
> >>definitely shouldn't lie about it in the keyword expansion.
> >
> >Ah, I see. That makes sense -- perhaps $LastChangedBy$ should remain
> >unexpanded, or say "<local>", or something.
I think I'm going to put "(Locally Modified)" as the author, and append the
'M' as suggest by Eric.
> >But, ... still kind of bikesheddy. I'd be happy with *any* of the
> >behaviors, including the current one. There are much more important
> >problems in Subversion :-).
>
> Hah. I'd say. Export-from-WC is one of the less blindingly critical
> features right now, for example...
Well, it didn't start out that way. :-) I wanted to beef up the test suite
and this just kind of ensued from there. But I'm hoping to get this wrapped
up soon, and if you have suggestions for something that isn't terribly
complicated, I'm all ears. I'd like to help you guys reach 1.0 as quick as
possible, and if my time can be better spent somewhere else, I'd like to know
about it.
-John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 18 23:39:52 2003