[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: permanent solution for deltification problem (issue #1601)

From: mark benedetto king <mbk_at_lowlatency.com>
Date: 2003-11-15 14:33:03 CET

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 01:03:38PM +0000, Mukund wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 12:03:46AM -0600, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> > Our "solution" was to take deltification out of the internal commit
> > process, make it available as the command 'svnadmin deltify', and
> > recommend it in the 'hooks/post-commit.tmpl' file that appears in
> > newly-created repositories. Further research by Mike Pilato confirmed
> > that running deltification on each commit, at the time the commit
> > happens, achieves better space savings than deltifying later.
> Why does deltifying later achieve lesser space savings? Isn't the same
> approach used, i.e., delta against committed contents?

BDB does't usually reclaim the space even though the records are


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Nov 15 14:33:18 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.