[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Windows Installer - New Layout, any thoughts?

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2003-11-14 22:49:30 CET

Andras Tantos wrote:

>>>Instead, split the types according to functionality:
>>> * Client (bin/ without svnserve + /iconv)
>>> * Server (Client + bin/svnserve + httpd/)
>>> * Scripting (python/ + bin/*.dll)
>>> * Development (doc/ + include/ + lib/ + bin/*.dll)
>>>Every install type should include the relevant .pdb files by default.
>>>Your minimal installer would then be a subset that provides just the
>>>Client and Server installation types.
>>Brilliant idea (never liked the "full" and "compact" stuff anyway)!
>Why have the PDBs in there by default? I would think only a 'development'
>setup would need them.
If you install the .pdb files, DrWatson can tell you exactly where your
program crashed. If users insist on sbmitting crash reports, I'd at
least want to know what happened.

Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 14 22:52:39 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.