[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Windows Installer - New Layout, any thoughts?

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2003-11-14 22:49:30 CET

Andras Tantos wrote:

>>>Instead, split the types according to functionality:
>>>
>>> * Client (bin/ without svnserve + /iconv)
>>> * Server (Client + bin/svnserve + httpd/)
>>> * Scripting (python/ + bin/*.dll)
>>> * Development (doc/ + include/ + lib/ + bin/*.dll)
>>>
>>>Every install type should include the relevant .pdb files by default.
>>>Your minimal installer would then be a subset that provides just the
>>>Client and Server installation types.
>>>
>>>
>>Brilliant idea (never liked the "full" and "compact" stuff anyway)!
>>
>>
>>
>
>Why have the PDBs in there by default? I would think only a 'development'
>setup would need them.
>
>
If you install the .pdb files, DrWatson can tell you exactly where your
program crashed. If users insist on sbmitting crash reports, I'd at
least want to know what happened.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 14 22:52:39 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.