kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>brane@xbc.nu writes:
>
>
>>The change to WC format v4 ("svn:this_dir" -> "") should be mentioned here.
>>
>>
>I considered this and decided not to list it. Users will never know
>their working copies have been upgraded, most of the time. The
>*visible* change here was the loss of support for v1 working copies,
>so that's what the changes list should show.
>
>
Unfortunately the error message is not very helpful when the wc version
does not match, so if you use an older version on an upgraded wc, all
you get is this:
> svn up
svn: Path is not a working copy directory
svn: '.' is not a working copy
Not that anyone should ever have to downgrade, of course. :-) I'll
improve that message for trunk, but the older versions are of course
impossible to fix. :-(
>Whups -- not worth a new tarball :-), but I'll fix the CHANGES file in
>trunk. Thanks, Brane.
>
>
Speaking of CHANGES... I missed the r7644 change in there. What is the
best way to handle that? Should we put it in CHANGES for the next
release or just ignore it?
/Tobias
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 14 16:54:46 2003