[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: rev 7695 - in trunk: doc/book subversion/include subversion/libsvn_fs subversion/libsvn_repos subversion/svnadmin subversion/tests/libsvn_fs

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2003-11-12 21:31:26 CET

On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 22:57, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > For example, if deltify r1000 requires creating of a fulltext of r999,
> > then you'd want to do 1000 *before* deltifying 999.
> Yeah, I guess sometimes giving the user the flexibility just doesn't
> pay off in the end.

I think right now correctness demands that we deltify revisions in
increasing order, even though that requires doing a lot of redundant
work. If we want to optimize deltfying multiple revisions, I think that
requires careful design.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 12 21:35:13 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.