On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:11:27AM -0500, mark benedetto king wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 07:34:28PM -0800, Brian Denny wrote:
> >
> > My patch merely sets an XSL customization property that is already
> > defined by the existing docbook-xsl stylesheets. However, it is
> > possible to define an XSL customization layer that overrides entire
> > XSL templates. I am 99% sure that it is possible to get what we want
> > this way, without touching the XML. It's just a question of how (and
> > how much work). If I knew more XSL I probably would have done it
> > already. Maybe I'll look into it some more.
> >
>
> Right, so it gets applied across the board; what is desired is exceptional
> behaviour.
Is it? Would a rule "show <refentry> items in the main TOC" have
undesirable effects? I.e., are there other <refentry> items which we
*don't* want to show up?
It's true that the most straightforward path to getting what we want in
this case would just be to wrap the <refentry> elements in
<sect3></sect3>. I am more than happy to do this, if it's acceptable
from a "what o'reilly needs from us" standpoint.
-brian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 12 16:38:34 2003