Blessed Binary Release Numbers: WAS: svn on Redhat 9 fails on co
From: Files <files_at_poetryunlimited.com>
Date: 2003-11-12 16:32:32 CET
Karl, Julian, Mike and anyone else
(Directed to Karl, since he gave me this answer originally).
A few weeks ago, in answer to a question, you informed me that the BLESSED
I am hoping that the release tarball has this information encoded already.
When building from the /tags directory, setting the rXXXX is a manual process.
I feel that having the CHANGES file out of step makes tracking the problems of
Should we encourage package maintainers to ensure their BLESSED binary builds
Instead of generating a perpetual chicken and egg scenario w/ different
-- Shamim Islam BA BS David Summers said: > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Files wrote: >> Barry Scott said: >> > $ svn --version >> > svn, version 0.32.1 (r7505) >> >> Is this the right number? I was under the impression that 0.32.1 was r7497. >> >> Was this a personal build? Sorry if this seems inapplicable, but I'm >> wondering >> if that might have something to do with your psvn error and such. >> > > I'm just guessing but probably he is using my Subversion RPMs. The r7505 > is the revision of the tag of the 0.32.1 release. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Wed Nov 12 16:33:21 2003 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.