Re: making the "rXXXX" convention official
From: Files <files_at_poetryunlimited.com>
Date: 2003-11-10 19:51:01 CET
I don't mind. But I question the need.
The RPM build set currently uses the rev data, as does the subversion
I've never really seen the need for the rXXXX EXCEPT in determining the
-1 IMHO.
-- Shamim Islam BA BS kfogel@collab.net said: > Anyone mind if I tweak 'svn log' output to print > > r7673 | jszakmeister | 2003-11-07 16:35:54 ... | ... > > instead of > > rev 7673: jszakmeister | 2003-11-07 16:35:54 ... | ... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Mon Nov 10 19:52:22 2003 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.