John Szakmeister <john@szakmeister.net> writes:
> That was actually a great idea, it seems to have brought up a couple of
> issues. Let's say I modify my working copy so that A/mu now has a property
> set on it (svn:eol-style) and I've appended new text to it. If I export the
> working copy, should I see the new property I set get applied? I ask,
> because right now if I export a working copy that has modified properties
> (but not committed), I don't see the new properties applied in the export
> operation. The documentation for export says "All local changes will be
> preserved, but files not under revision control will not be copied." Well,
> technically setting a property but not committing it is a local change, and
> I'm not seeing it get exported.
>
> So what's the right behavior here? Should export be applying these new
> properties? If not, then should we update the documentation to reflect this
> fact? If export should be applying these properties, should I open an issue?
Yeah, I think it should use the working props & text, not the base
props & text. But I have to admit, I've never really understood the
use cases for our "export a working copy" functionality, and so
wouldn't consider these to be pre-1.0 bugs (just IMHO).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Nov 9 20:05:00 2003