Re: issue #1573: fs deltification causes delays

C. Michael Pilato wrote:

>"Glenn A. Thompson" <gthompson@cdr.net> writes:
>
>
>>Ignoring the unsupported issue, I like what you propose. One thing
>>though, IMHO svn_fs_deltify should not be part of the *core*
>>svn_fs.h API. Would you consider *not* putting svn_fs_deltify back
>>in to svn_fs.h? I'd prefer seeing it in some sort of maintenance
>>header file.
>>
>>
>
>I know where you're heading here. What business is it of the outside
>world to know a darned thing about the storage mechanism used by the
>database? And I hear you, I really do. But I see no compelling
>reason for this not to go in svn_fs.h. It must be a public interface,
>and there's no reason to introduce a new public interface file for a
>single function. Would you feel better if it were called
>svn_fs_deltify_berkeley()?
>
>
Deltification has nothing to do with the FS back-end, either. What fun,
eh? :-)

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org