Re: Svn broken over https as a piped process
From: Files <files_at_poetryunlimited.com>
Date: 2003-11-07 16:09:27 CET
Ok. I look into this, but there's only one problem.
How many times have we reinvented client processes like svn info in SWIG?
Can I leverage any of that? Anyone know if those equivalents have been moved
I don't want to reinvent the wheel if I don't have to.
-- Shamim Islam BA BS Ben Gollmer said: > Imagine writing the SWIG bindings for PHP :) > > http://www.swig.org/Doc1.3/Php.html > > Seriously, I noodled around a bit with this a while ago, but I never really > got > anywhere. I didn't have enough time to invest in the project. But it would be > damn cool if someone got it working. > > -- > Ben > > On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 08:36:57 -0600, Files <files@poetryunlimited.com> wrote: >> You have SWIG bindings for me for PHP? >> -- >> Shamim Islam >> BA BS >> >> Branko ?ibej said: >> > Files wrote: >> >>Now, imagine calling that from perl or from php via a pipe() call. >> >> >> >> >> > Imagine using the SWIG Perl bindings instead. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Fri Nov 7 16:10:09 2003 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.