[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Unexpected output from "svn log"

From: Alon Ziv <alonz_at_nolaviz.org>
Date: 2003-11-06 15:55:01 CET

Isn't this one more thing that may be fixed with the same changes
discussed for "new diff syntax"? I.e., have "svn log" also have a PEG
revision (HEAD for a URL, BASE for a WC path), and let it use the
(default) revision range 1:HEAD always, converting it to actual paths by
following history?

        -Alon Ziv

-----Original Message-----
From: cmpilato@localhost.localdomain
[mailto:cmpilato@localhost.localdomain] On Behalf Of C. Michael Pilato
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:33 PM
To: kfogel@collab.net
Cc: Branko ?ibej; Gustavo Niemeyer; dev@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: Unexpected output from "svn log"

kfogel@collab.net writes:

> Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> > Your '.' directory is probably at version 159. That's where 'svn
log'
> > gets its version number, if you don't give it parameters.
>
> No, 'svn log' chooses a default path based on the current directory,
> but for revision it defaults to HEAD. Try it.

Sorry, Karl, you're absolutely wrong on this. Yes, for a URL, HEAD is
chosen, but for a working copy path, it's BASE.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 6 15:55:56 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.