[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: issue #1573: fs deltification causes delays

From: Sander Striker <striker_at_apache.org>
Date: 2003-11-05 21:35:05 CET

> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gstein@lyra.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 9:16 PM

> > You can do a forced flush.
> Euh... please, no. We really don't want to get into the business of
> monkeying with what Apache decides is the proper behavior for delivery of
> data to the socket.

I didn't say you should. I said you can.
> As Justin pointed out, putting a clean on the request pool might work out.
> However, that *does* imply that other request cleanups could be delayed,
> and it also delays a return to Apache to deal with the connection object.
> In particular, we want to return control to Apache so that it can process
> the DELETE request which directly follows the MERGE request.

Not to mention that you shouldn't do allocations, subpool creation, etc.
inside a pool cleanup.

I don't really see a clean option here other than doing deltification in
a seperate process.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 5 21:36:04 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.