[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn rev 7629: FAIL (i386-unknown-freebsdelf5.0 shared)

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-11-05 20:16:58 CET

On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 13:10, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:00:26PM +0100, brane@xbc.nu wrote:
> >...
> > We've been here before, I'm testing against HEAD of apr anr apr-util.
> > Maybe I should switch to the 0.9 branch, but IMHO the branches should
> > be equivalent/compatible as far as Subversion is concerned.
> No, I don't think they are. By definition, they do not have to be -- there
> is a bump in the major revision.

I think brane's nightly-build system is flawed here. I really don't
like the fact that it builds against APR HEAD.

If someone commits a bug to APR HEAD, that should *not* cause svn's
regression tests to fail. Our regression tests should be about
Subversion bugs, not bugs in unreleased libraries we depend on.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 5 20:17:57 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.