Re: issue #1573: fs deltification causes delays

At 4:30 PM -0600 11/4/03, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
>I know of no reason why a user would have *more* problems to
>deal with, even if 'svnadmin tunefs' is called as frequently as during
>a post-commit hook.

OK, the lock management strategy appears to be safe (or "correctness
preserving under this transformation").

What about the queue management for things needing deltification, in
case it's run less often, and the queue builds up enough that the
next scheduled run starts before the last completes? Manage that
(I'm sure you can, you're such a clever boy!), and I'll feel better.

At 6:24 PM -0600 11/4/03, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>Enabling it for files over a certain size doesn't help much, because
>it turns off the feature precisely where it would help the most.

Interesting claim ("where it would help most"). I fear the
determination of how much deltification helps in any given case is
considerably more subtle than mere size.

-- 
-==-
Jack Repenning
CollabNet, Inc.
8000 Marina Boulevard, Suite 600
Brisbane, California 94005
o: 650.228.2562
c: 408.835.8090
f: 650.228.2501
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org