Re: [PATCH] Release candidate patch for adding external lockingfilecode to svn_repos_open
From: Files <files_at_poetryunlimited.com>
Date: 2003-11-05 02:00:02 CET
David,
If the lock_time can't be in the repos_t, something else needs to be.
The real behavior that we're presenting is that the system only attempt to
Since you had originally had the lock_time set to 0 and then set it to a value
It doesn't need to be lock_time. But there needs to be a sentinel. Otherwise,
I'm looking to try the lock only once. A singleton operation. per instance of
It's a per-repository lock, so if there is more than one repository being
It's also a per-repository option.
What is the behavior when you have the lock_time located in the repos_t???
Am I making any sense?
Thanks.
-- Shamim Islam BA BS David Kopp said: > Hello again, > > I have made a few modifications to Shamim's patch and come up with the > attached patch. > > I moved some of the functions to the top of the file in order to satisfy > the compiler. I also removed lock_time from svn_repos_t and made it a > static variable of create_external_lock_if_requested. (It doesn't work > otherwise). > > So, what do the rest of you think? I would like to have this added, > because then I would be able to use Subversion at work. > > David Kopp > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Wed Nov 5 02:00:44 2003 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.