John Szakmeister <jszakmeister@actelesys.com> writes:
> That's exactly what I'm proposing. I'll see if I can hack that in tonight.
> Thanks!
No, thank you! I hereby commit to reviewing it, then :-).
-K
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kfogel@collab.net [mailto:kfogel@collab.net]
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 12:32 PM
> To: John Szakmeister
> Cc: Subversion Development List
> Subject: Re: svn blame -r REV
>
>
> John Szakmeister <john@szakmeister.net> writes:
> > I actually pointed it out in this message:
> > http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2003-10/1608.shtml
>
> Sorry -- I knew there had been a thread about this, and remembered
> with regret that I hadn't followed it closely enough at the time :-).
>
> > But no one piped in to say why they made it work that way. It appears
> that
> > when you specify a revision, it actually starts generating the annotation
> > *from* that revision to HEAD. I think it should start from 1 and go to
> the
> > rev you specify (which is what I think you wanted too). I can make a
> patch
> > and fix that, but I was hoping to get a little guidance from someone that
> it
> > was the Right Thing To Do.
>
> I completely agree, as does Mike Pilato (who sat with me as we
> stumbled through our intuition into the real behavior).
>
> So what you're proposing is:
>
> svn blame foo.c behaves as currently
> svn blame -rN foo.c behaves like 'svn blame -r1:N foo.c'
> svn blame -rN:M foo.c behaves as currently
>
> right?
>
> If so, +1 all over that.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 3 20:34:06 2003