Re: Fixing time stamps

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> > A read-only working copy need not be a fatal error.
>
> The argument is not that svn st would fail if it can't get a write
> lock. The argument is that svn st would cause another, legitimately
> read/write operation (like svn update) to fail because it has a write
> lock.

Thanks, that's a very useful clarification.

If working copy timestamps are kept incrementally up-to-date as a
matter of course, then these locks will be very rare, so it's not a
big deal I think.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 31 19:13:06 2003