Re: Fixing time stamps

kfogel@collab.net wrote:

> It doesn't break Subversion, it doesn't break Subversion, it doesn't
> break Subversion... :-)
Good ole Vinyl-Roms ;-) Broken CDs just don't have the same beat.

> (Sorry to sound like a broken record, but this misunderstanding
> appears to pervade this thread.)
>
> A read-only working copy need not be a fatal error. This optimization
> can be opportunistic; there is no correctness consequence if it
> doesn't happen. (And if the working copy is read-only, any other
> solution is going to fail too, even 'svn cleanup').
This is all well understood. Didn't I write 'read-only operation' and
not 'read-only WC'?
I was just suggesting an approach that might also be acceptible :-).

Cheers
-Lübbe

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 31 15:46:39 2003