[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Revision 2 [was Re: [PATCH] Fix for Issue #1093 (pre-release)]

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-10-30 17:13:38 CET

Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> writes:

> > 3. The peg revision must always be greater than (younger than) the
> > youngest revision in the operative range.
>
> (You mean "younger or equal", judging by your example below.)
>
> Why must it? Are you saying that because it is difficult to
> implement forward tracking?

Yes.

> I'm not sure that that restriction is acceptable from a use-case
> point of view.

Fine.

  ,--.
  `--'
  ,--.
  | |
  | |
  | |
  | | CONCEDE. (in ASCII graphics)
  `--'

I'm fine with Subversion trying its darnedest to do the right thing.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 30 17:14:55 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.