[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Adding LAN support to Subversion - Clarification

From: Benjamin Pflugmann <benjamin-svn-dev_at_pflugmann.de>
Date: 2003-10-29 00:47:16 CET

On Tue 2003-10-28 at 15:36:20 -0500, Greg Hudson wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 15:21, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
> > Well, IIRC, for svn over SSH we have "svn+ssh://". So how about
> > "file+lock://" or [...]
> Would people please stop leading this guy down the wrong road?

I am sorry. I only skimmed the thread. Not deep enough, to realize
that the scheme question has been moot for the (in the meantime)
preferred path of action.

> If one wants to introduce an optional big lock around the
> repository, one should control that with a piece of repository
> configuration, not with the URL scheme.

Well, I didn't say nor meant to imply that a the URL scheme should be
the way to go. From my point of view, I simply made a suggestion for
what an URL scheme, which builds functionality on an existing scheme
should look like.



To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 29 00:48:02 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.