Re: Proposal for svnserve configuration

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> Question: Should the default for anon-access be none, instead of read?
> There's something to be said for the theory that all access should be
> granted explicitly, never implicitly. But on the other hand, we are
> targeting open-source projects here. (Also, making the default none
> would present an immediate transition issue for svnserve users.)

Anon access by default sounds cool to me.

> Question: When I (hopefully) add path-based auth support, do people
> think I should just fold it into this file, or should it be a separate
> file so that it can have exactly the same format as the mod_authz_svn
> control file?

Same format as mod_authz_svn good. Also, separate from non-auth
configuration good :-).

> General comments are also welcome. I will get started on implementing
> this, but

Mail sent prematurely?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 28 22:05:54 2003