Re: issue #1429 progress: ra_dav changing analogously to ra_svn

On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Yep, your understanding is correct (sharp eyes!). But as Greg Hudson
> pointed out, we know of no instances of people taking advantage of
> proxy caching for Subversion, and it makes no sense to penalize all
> users for the sake of no users.
>
> Perhaps it should be listed as another caveat, but I think it's not a
> very major one. CVS users have never had any caching at all.

Agreed. Just looking ahead to when this stuff would be useful &
important. If it is, we could create a svn-aware proxy that had some
extra intelligence in it.

        Brian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 28 03:07:12 2003