Hi Noel,
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>The current Java API's that rely on JNI are bad
>>
>>
>
>And you gave a very good list of reasons why.
>
>However, apparently, Subversion does a great deal of work on the client
>side, so it is not a matter of just writing a transport layer. See:
>http://subversion.tigris.org/files/documents/15/17/svn-design.html#Client%20Layer.
>From the responses, it seems that the major concern is in that area, not the
>wire-level protocol. Writing just a WebDAV transport (for which there is a
>good starting point at Apache), for example, would be just part of the
>picture.
>
I think for building a full pure java client you have to port 95% of the
C-code to java and keep it in sync with the C-code. That why I went the
JNI-way.
>
> --- Noel
>
Regards,
Patrick
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 23 19:46:39 2003